XUV 3XO REVX A vs Kylaq Signature Plus: Which Compact SUV Gives You More for the Money?

We pit the Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A against the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus to find out which compact SUV offers better value.

By Kaushik Das

Published On:

🕓 3 min read

Follow Us

By Kaushik Das

Published On:

Follow Us

🕓 3 min read

Side-by-side comparison of Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A and Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus SUVs

So you’re torn between the XUV 3XO REVX A vs Kylaq Signature Plus, huh? You’re not alone. Both compact SUVs offer a mix of style, features, and performance – all while staying budget-friendly. So, which one truly offers better value on the road? Here’s how they stack up when you dive into the details.

Design and Size: Which Looks and Feels Bigger?

At first glance, the Kylaq looks slightly longer at 3995 mm compared to the XUV’s 3990 mm, but Mahindra claws back with a wider body (1821 mm vs 1783 mm) and taller height (1647 mm vs 1619 mm). Even the wheelbase is longer on the 3XO, so it looks more planted and stable.

The difference? The Kylaq leans toward a clean, European aesthetic, while the XUV 3XO carries a chunkier, more upright stance that feels every bit like a traditional SUV. Boot space is almost equal (364L vs 360L), so neither wins big there.

Performance and Engine: Turbo Talk

This is where the XUV 3XO wins.

  • XUV 3XO REVX A gets a 1.2L TGDi turbo-petrol engine that churns out 130 PS and 230 Nm of torque.
  • Under the hood, the Kylaq Signature Plus runs on a 1.0-litre TSI turbo-petrol engine that puts out up to 115 PS of power and 178 Nm of torque.

Both get a 6-speed manual and automatic option, but on paper and on-road, the XUV feels more enthusiastic – especially during quick overtakes and hill climbs.

Cabin Experience and Features: Who Wins Inside?

Both are packed, but the XUV 3XO REVX A edges ahead with a few segment-firsts:

  • Dual 10.25-inch screens (infotainment + driver’s display)
  • Panoramic sunroof (vs single-pane on Kylaq)
  • Dual-zone climate control, connected car tech with Alexa, and voice-assisted sunroof

The Kylaq Signature Plus brings in refinement with ventilated front seats, “Simply Clever” features, and a slightly more premium cabin layout. But it misses out on some tech goodies that the XUV has.

Price Check: Worth the Extra Cash?

  • XUV 3XO REVX A (Automatic): ₹12.99 Lakh
  • Kylaq Signature Plus (Automatic): ₹12.35 Lakh

Yes, the Kylaq is cheaper. But for ₹64,000 more, the XUV gets you more power, more tech and an arguably better SUV stance. The manual variants have a similar difference.


ALSO READ: More Style & Features: Mahindra XUV 3XO Adds New REVX M, M(O), and A Variants from Rs 8.94 Lakh


FAQs

Which SUV is better on highways?
The XUV 3XO REVX A has more oomph thanks to its 1.2L turbo engine, so it’s the better choice for highway driving and overtakes.

Is the price difference between XUV and Kylaq worth it?
If you want more power, dual-zone comfort and more screens, then yes – the extra cost of 3XO is justified.

Verdict:

In the XUV 3XO REVX A vs Kylaq Signature Plus fight, Mahindra’s contender has more firepower – especially for tech enthusiasts and power hounds. The Kylaq holds its own with comfort and premium finish, but if you want the most car for your money, 3XO is hard to beat.

Hello! I’m Kaushik Das, a passionate automobile content writer with over two years of experience crafting detailed reviews, news updates, and expert insights. My work connects enthusiasts with the latest trends, technologies, and developments shaping India’s automotive world.Feel free to reach out at i.kaushikdas7@gmail.com.

Leave a Comment

Join WhatsApp Channel